## Chapter 7: Diagnostic Context

Authors: Ceki Gülcü, Sébastien Pennec

| Copyright © 2000-2006, QOS.ch This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License .

One of the design goals of logback is to audit and debug complex distributed applications. Most real-world distributed systems need to deal with multiple clients simultaneously. In a typical multithreaded implementation of such a system, different threads will handle different clients. A possible but discouraged approach to differentiate the logging output of one client from another consists of instantiating a new and separate logger for each client. This technique promotes the proliferation of loggers and considerably increases their management overhead.

A lighter technique consists of uniquely stamping each log request servicing a given client. Neil Harrison described this method in the book Patterns for Logging Diagnostic Messages in Pattern Languages of Program Design 3, edited by R. Martin, D. Riehle, and F. Buschmann (Addison-Wesley, 1997). Logback offers a variant of this technique: Mapped Diagnostic Contexts (MDC).

To uniquely stamp each request, the user puts contextual information into the `MDC`, the abbreviation of Mapped Diagnostic Context. The public interface of the MDC class is shown below.

    package ch.qos.logback.classic;

    public class MDC {
      //Put a context value as identified by key
      //into the current thread's context map.
      public static void put(String key, String val);

      //Get the context identified by the key parameter.
      public static String get(String key);

      //Remove the the context identified by the key parameter.
      public static void remove(String key);

      //Clear all entries in the MDC.
      public static void clear();

      //Returns the keys in the MDC as a Set. The returned value can be null.
      public static Set<String> getKeys();
    }

The `MDC` class contains only static methods. It lets the developer place information in a diagnostic context that can be subsequently retrieved by certain logback components. The `MDC` manages contextual information on a per thread basis. Typically, while starting to service a new client request, the developer will insert pertinent contextual information, such as the client id, client's IP address, request parameters etc. into the `MDC`. Logback components, if appropriately configured, will automatically include this information in each log entry.

The next application named `SimpleMDC` demonstrates this basic principle.

Example 7.1: Basic MDC usage ( logback-examples/src/main/java/chapter7/SimpleMDC.java)

    package chapter7;

    import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

    import ch.qos.logback.classic.Logger;
    import ch.qos.logback.classic.MDC;
    import ch.qos.logback.classic.PatternLayout;
    import ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender;

    public class SimpleMDC {
      static public void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        // You can put values in the MDC at any time. We first put the
        // first name
        MDC.put("first", "Dorothy");

        // Configure logback
        PatternLayout layout = new PatternLayout();
        layout.setPattern("%X{first} %X{last} - %m%n");
        layout.start();
        ConsoleAppender appender = new ConsoleAppender();
        appender.setLayout(layout);
        appender.start();
        Logger root = (Logger)LoggerFactory.getLogger("root");
        root.addAppender(appender);

        // get a logger
        Logger logger = (Logger)LoggerFactory.getLogger(SimpleMDC.class);

        // We now put the last name
        MDC.put("last", "Parker");

        // The most beautiful two words in the English language according
        // to Dorothy Parker:
        logger.info("Check enclosed.");
        logger.debug("The most beautiful two words in English.");

        MDC.put("first", "Richard");
        MDC.put("last", "Nixon");
        logger.info("I am not a crook.");
        logger.info("Attributed to the former US president. 17 Nov 1973.");
      }
    }

The main method starts by associating the value Dorothy with the key first in the `MDC`. You can place as many value/key associations in the `MDC` as you wish. Multiple insertions with the same key will overwrite older values. The code then proceeds to configure logback. Note the usage of the %X specifier within the `PatternLayout` conversion pattern. The %X conversion specifier is employed twice, once for the key first and once for the key last. After configuring the root logger, the code associates the value Parker with the key last. It then invokes the logger twice with different messages. The code finishes by setting the `MDC` to different values and issuing several logging requests. Running SimpleMDC yields:

    Dorothy Parker - Check enclosed.
    Dorothy Parker - The most beautiful two words in English.
    Richard Nixon - I am not a crook.
    Richard Nixon - Attributed to the former US president. 17 Nov 1973.

The `SimpleMDC` application illustrates how logback layouts, if configured appropriately, automatically output `MDC` information. Moreover, the information placed into the `MDC` can be used by multiple logger invocations.

Mapped Diagnostic Contexts shine brightest within client server architectures. Typically, multiple clients will be served by multiple threads on the server. Although the methods in the `MDC` class are static, the diagnostic context is managed on a per thread basis, allowing each server thread to bear a distinct `MDC` stamp. `MDC` operations such as `put()` and `get()` affect the `MDC` of the current thread only. The `MDC` in other threads remain unaffected. Given that `MDC` information is managed on a per thread basis, each thread will have its own copy of the `MDC`. Thus, there is no need for the developer to worry about thread-safety or synchronization when programming with the `MDC` because it safely and transparently handles these issues.

The next example is somewhat more advanced. It shows how the `MDC` can be used in a client-server setting. The server-side implements the `NumberCruncher` interface shown in Example 7.2 below. `The NumberCruncher` interface contains a single method named `factor()`. Using RMI technology, client invokes the `factor()` method of the server application to retrieve the distinct factors of an integer.

Example 7.2: The service interface ( logback-examples/src/main/java/chapter7/NumberCruncher.java)

    package chapter7;

    import java.rmi.Remote;
    import java.rmi.RemoteException;

    /**
     * NumberCruncher factors positive integers.
     */
    public interface NumberCruncher extends Remote {
      /**
       * Factor a positive integer number and return its
       * distinct factor's as an integer array.
       * */
      int[] factor(int number) throws RemoteException;
    }

The `NumberCruncherServer` application, listed in Example 7.3 below, implements the `NumberCruncher` interface. Its main method exports an RMI Registry on the local host that accepts requests on a well-known port.

Example 7.3: The server side ( logback-examples/src/main/java/chapter7/NumberCruncherServer.java)

    package chapter7;

    import java.rmi.RemoteException;
    import java.rmi.registry.LocateRegistry;
    import java.rmi.registry.Registry;
    import java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject;
    import java.util.Vector;

    import org.slf4j.Logger;
    import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

    import ch.qos.logback.classic.LoggerContext;
    import ch.qos.logback.classic.MDC;
    import ch.qos.logback.classic.joran.JoranConfigurator;
    import ch.qos.logback.core.joran.spi.JoranException;

    /**
     * A simple NumberCruncher implementation that logs its progress when
     * factoring numbers. The purpose of the whole exercise is to show the
     * use of mapped diagnostic contexts in order to distinguish the log
     * output from different client requests.
     * */
    public class NumberCruncherServer extends UnicastRemoteObject
      implements NumberCruncher {

      private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

      static Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(NumberCruncherServer.class);

      public NumberCruncherServer() throws RemoteException {
      }

      public int[] factor(int number) throws RemoteException {
        // The client's host is an important source of information.
        try {
          MDC.put("client", NumberCruncherServer.getClientHost());
        } catch (java.rmi.server.ServerNotActiveException e) {
          logger.warn("Caught unexpected ServerNotActiveException.", e);
        }

        // The information contained within the request is another source
        // of distinctive information. It might reveal the users name,
        // date of request, request ID etc. In servlet type environments,
        // useful information is contained in the HttpRequest or in the
        // HttpSession.
        MDC.put("number", String.valueOf(number));

        logger.info("Beginning to factor.");

        if (number <= 0) {
          throw new IllegalArgumentException(number +
            " is not a positive integer.");
        } else if (number == 1) {
          return new int[] { 1 };
        }

        Vector<Integer> factors = new Vector<Integer>();
        int n = number;

        for (int i = 2; (i <= n) && ((i * i) <= number); i++) {
          // It is bad practice to place log requests within tight loops.
          // It is done here to show interleaved log output from
          // different requests.
          logger.debug("Trying " + i + " as a factor.");

          if ((n % i) == 0) {
            logger.info("Found factor " + i);
            factors.addElement(new Integer(i));

            do {
              n /= i;
            } while ((n % i) == 0);
          }

          // Placing artificial delays in tight-loops will also lead to
          // sub-optimal resuts. :-)
          delay(100);
        }

        if (n != 1) {
          logger.info("Found factor " + n);
          factors.addElement(new Integer(n));
        }

        int len = factors.size();

        int[] result = new int[len];

        for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
          result[i] = ((Integer) factors.elementAt(i)).intValue();
        }

        // clean up
        MDC.remove("client");
        MDC.remove("number");

        return result;
      }

      static void usage(String msg) {
        System.err.println(msg);
        System.err.println("Usage: java chapter7.NumberCruncherServer configFile\n" +
          "   where configFile is a logback configuration file.");
        System.exit(1);
      }

      public static void delay(int millis) {
        try {
          Thread.sleep(millis);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
        }
      }

      public static void main(String[] args) {
        if (args.length != 1) {
          usage("Wrong number of arguments.");
        }

        String configFile = args[0];

        if (configFile.endsWith(".xml")) {
          try {
            LoggerContext lc = (LoggerContext) LoggerFactory.getILoggerFactory();
            JoranConfigurator configurator = new JoranConfigurator();
            configurator.setContext(lc);
            lc.shutdownAndReset();
            configurator.doConfigure(args[0]);
          } catch (JoranException je) {
            je.printStackTrace();
          }
        }

        NumberCruncherServer ncs;

        try {
          ncs = new NumberCruncherServer();
          logger.info("Creating registry.");

          Registry registry = LocateRegistry.createRegistry(Registry.REGISTRY_PORT);
          registry.rebind("Factor", ncs);
          logger.info("NumberCruncherServer bound and ready.");
        } catch (Exception e) {
          logger.error("Could not bind NumberCruncherServer.", e);

          return;
        }
      }
    }

The implementation of the `factor(int number)` method is of particular relevance. It starts by putting the client's hostname into the `MDC` under the key client. The number to factor, as requested by the client, is put into the `MDC` under the key number. After computing the distinct factors of the integer parameter, the result is returned to the client. Before returning the result however, the values for the client and number are cleared by calling the `MDC.remove()` method. Normally, a `put()` operation should be balanced by the corresponding `remove()` operation. Otherwise, the `MDC` will contain stale values for certain keys. We would recommend that whenever possible `remove()` operations be performed within finally blocks, ensuring their invocation regardless of the execution path of the code.

After these theoretical explanations, we are ready to run the number cruncher example. Start the server with the following command:

    java chapter7.NumberCruncherServer src/main/java/chapter7/mdc1.xml

The mdc1.xml configuration file is listed below:

Example 7.4: Configuration file (logback-examples/src/main/java/chapter7/mdc1.xml)

    <configuration>

      <appender name="CONSOLE"
        class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender">
        <layout class="ch.qos.logback.classic.PatternLayout">
          <Pattern>%-4r [%thread] %-5level C:%X{client} N:%X{number} - %msg%n</Pattern>
        </layout>
      </appender>

      <root>
        <level value ="debug"/>
        <appender-ref ref="CONSOLE"/>
      </root>
    </configuration>

Note the use of the %X conversion specifier within the Pattern option.

The following command starts an instance of `NumberCruncherClient` application:

    java chapter7.NumberCruncherClient hostname

where hostname is the host where the `NumberCruncherServer` is running

Executing multiple instances of the client and requesting the server to factor the numbers 129 from the first client and shortly thereafter the number 71 from the second client, the server outputs the following:

    70984 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] INFO  C:orion N:129 - Beginning to factor.
    70984 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 2 as a factor.
    71093 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 3 as a factor.
    71093 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] INFO  C:orion N:129 - Found factor 3
    71187 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 4 as a factor.
    71297 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 5 as a factor.
    71390 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 6 as a factor.
    71453 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] INFO  C:orion N:71 - Beginning to factor.
    71453 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:71 - Trying 2 as a factor.
    71484 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 7 as a factor.
    71547 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:71 - Trying 3 as a factor.
    71593 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 8 as a factor.
    71656 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:71 - Trying 4 as a factor.
    71687 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 9 as a factor.
    71750 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:71 - Trying 5 as a factor.
    71797 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 10 as a factor.
    71859 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:71 - Trying 6 as a factor.
    71890 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:129 - Trying 11 as a factor.
    71953 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:71 - Trying 7 as a factor.
    72000 [RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.1.6] INFO  C:orion N:129 - Found factor 43
    72062 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] DEBUG C:orion N:71 - Trying 8 as a factor.
    72156 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-192.168.1.6] INFO  C:orion N:71 - Found factor 71

The clients were run from a machine called orion as can be seen in the above output. Even if the server processes the requests of clients near-simultaneously in separate threads, the logging output pertaining to each client request can be distinguished by studying the output of the `MDC`. Note for example the stamp associated with number, i.e. the number to factor.

The attentive reader might have observed that the thread name could also have been used to distinguish each request. The thread name can cause confusion if the server side technology recycles threads. In that case, it may be hard to determine the boundaries of each request, that is, when a given thread finishes servicing a request and when it begins servicing the next. Because the `MDC` is under the control of the application developer, `MDC` stamps do not suffer from this problem.